Robert Hawkins

Déclarations dans les débats

Debates of , 20th Assembly, 1st Session (day 11)

Thank you. So just to be clear, whether just for me or potentially others, this $24 million is anticipated or sorry, is going to be used for the cost to fire fighting the fire, but the money received to date isn't applied directly to that overall cost?

Debates of , 20th Assembly, 1st Session (day 11)

It's okay. No, thank you, I think I understood it now. It's this $841,000 is intended to pay our 48 percent of the overall funding for that fiscal year for the nine new members. And I'm seeing a nod. That's fine, okay.

That said, are these permanent positions, just to clarify moving forward? Thank you.

Debates of , 20th Assembly, 1st Session (day 11)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I see that there's $24 million plus earmarked for the fire suppression. This is supplementary funding. Is the so this is on top of what's also been provided earlier. Can the Minister start the this round of questioning off with clarifying how much to date has been allocated for the I'm assuming last year's firefighting season? Thank you.

Debates of , 20th Assembly, 1st Session (day 11)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I just wanted to follow up ever so briefly on that. It looks like we're missing a the Minister may have said it, but we got Aklavik, Dettah, Fort Good Hope, two in Fort Smith, one KDFN, one for Whati, and one for Fort McPherson. That gives us eight. Did we miss one, or is it actually eight members? That's the first question.

Debates of , 20th Assembly, 1st Session (day 11)

Any chance they could provide it to the Members? Thank you.

Debates of , 20th Assembly, 1st Session (day 11)

So just a and I understand that. I just it sounds like at one way that there's money already committed to this initiative and this is just backfilling it in some way. And so that's why I'm curious on how the process is working specifically to this because if people are interested in sorry, I wouldn't use interest. I'd say if people still need support and if the program is still open or not open, if it's receiving money or it's spent or they're backfilling or overspent, that's the type of clarification I'm trying to (audio). So if there's still room for applications, I think I sort of heard...

Debates of , 20th Assembly, 1st Session (day 11)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. With respect to the two positions, are they currently staffed? Thank you.

Debates of , 20th Assembly, 1st Session (day 11)

Can I get some confirmation from the department it's not an overspent program and we're looking at ways to sort of help fill some gaps. It's similar to the original question, but it sounds like they're still taking applications but if there's no money, why are we taking applications. So I just need some clarity. Thank you.

Debates of , 20th Assembly, 1st Session (day 11)

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And, of course, before I begin my questions, I'll note that being first in the cue and then the power goes out, and I won't say that's suspicious or incidental. Ah, the government will do anything to deny questions, so.

But no, on a serious note, Mr. Chairman, under this section we have water surveillance and we have climate change preparedness. And I'm wondering if the Minister can flesh out both of those two categories as in what the public would see and how they'd be reported for and that's specifically more for the wastewater surveillance. The second piece being...

Debates of , 20th Assembly, 1st Session (day 11)

Just confirming this is new money, not replacement of some sort. That was a question.